CHEMO-RISK -
Chemometers for in situ risk assessment of mixtures of pollutants

Group picture february 2019
The CHEMO-RISK group in February, 2019. Picture: Sebastian Wiedling. From left to right: Jörg Watzke, Theo Wernicke, Fanny Rosello, Melis Muz, Elisa Rojo Nieto, Eva Reiter, Annika Jahnke.

The ERC-funded project CHEMO-RISK started in May, 2017. CHEMO-RISK aims for a novel scientifically sound chemical risk assessment paradigm that integrates exposure and effect assessment of a broad range of chemicals into a single procedure and provides information relevant to ecosystem and human health. The key innovation is polymer “chemometers” that will be equilibrated with their surroundings and deliver information on the pollutant’s chemical activity in the environment, biota, and humans. A chemometer functions analogously to a thermometer, but instead of the temperature, it yields a measure of chemical activity. Chemical activity in turn indicates the thermodynamic potential for, e.g., partitioning, biouptake and toxicity. CHEMO-RISK aims at breaking the current paradigm in environmental risk assessment of single chemicals that disregards bioavailability, ignores mixture effects, lacks site-specificity and is difficult to extrapolate to human health

Group leader: Annika Jahnke (contact: annika.jahnke[at]ufz.de)

Current team members: Jörg Watzke, Elisa Rojo Nieto, Eva Reiter, Theo Wernicke, Fanny Rosello, Sebastian Abel, Veronika Schacht

Former team members: Meliz Muz, Madlen Landmann, Anne Jäger, Anna Sophia Martin

Project outline
CHEMO-RISK is structured in four subprojects.

CHEMO-RISK aims for a novel scientifically sound chemical risk assessment paradigm that integrates exposure and effect assessment of a broad range of chemicals into a single procedure and provides information relevant to ecosystem and human health. The overall objectives are to answer the following questions: Which processes drive the enrichment of pollutants in aquatic biota on a thermodynamic basis (subproject A, Elisa Rojo Nieto)? How do pollutants distribute within an organism, and which effects do they elicit at the key target sites (subproject B, Eva Reiter)? Can we apply everyday-life items such as silicone plasters to replace invasive sampling of blood in human health risk assessment (subproject C, Sebastian Abel)? To which degree can pattern analysis of chemometer extracts help identify emerging chemicals and explain the observed toxicity profiles across media (subproject D, Veronika Schacht)?


CHEMO-RISK logo
The logo of CHEMO-RISK.

The CHEMO-RISK team has addressed developing ”chemometer” passive samplers for the transfer of mixtures of environmental pollutants from different environmental media (sediment, water, biota of various trophic levels) and body compartments (blubber, brain, liver, kidney and blood of mammals) to the laboratory for their characterization. A special focus of the ”chemometer” concept is on comparability across media which is achieved by using silicone as the common sampling phase for all types of samples. The pollutants partition into the silicone according to their activity in the sample until both phases reach thermodynamic equilibrium. Then, the silicone is retrieved, its surface is thoroughly cleaned and the chemicals are solvent-extracted for chemical analysis or bioanalytical screening. The data (equilibrium partitioning concentrations in silicone, Csilicone⇌medium) can then be compared directly across media, e.g., to assess biota/sediment accumulation of various pollutants.

The issue of mixture risk characterization is of huge importance for society which on the one hand largely relies on multiple chemicals to provide or secure certain service functions (e.g., food, clean water, transport, medication), while on the other hand striving for a healthy, non-toxic environment for humans and ecosystems. Fulfilling both requirements calls for sound assessment of the hazards and risks arising from the presence of complex mixtures of chemicals in the multimedia environment covering a multitude of different ecosystems and environmental conditions. However, current risk assessment relies on a small number of individual, so-called ”indicator” chemicals being monitored and their effect testing in few indicator species, which implies uncertainty in terms of potential cocktail effects of multiple chemicals and does not cover diverse ecosystems where these chemicals may, e.g., be bioavailable to different degrees.

Field excursion.
Field excursion to the Seal Station Büsum. Picture: Elisa Rojo Nieto