Publication Details |
| Category | Text Publication |
| Reference Category | Conference papers |
| Title (Primary) | The consequences of using different analysis techniques on wildlife study data to model disease transmission |
| Title (Secondary) | Proceedings of the 9th Symposium of the International Society for Veterinary Epidemiology and Economics (ISVEE 9), Breckenridge, CO, USA, 6-11 August 2000 |
| Author | Staubach, C.; Stiebling, U.; Ziller, M.; Tackmann, K.; Thulke, H.-H.; Schlüter, H. |
| Publisher | Salman, M.D.; Morley, P.S.; Ruch-Gallie, R. |
| Year | 2000 |
| Department | OESA |
| Page From | 885 |
| Page To | 887 |
| Abstract | The development of models of wildlife diseases is heavily dependent on the results and interpretation of wildlife ecological studies. Parameters, e.g., contact rates, animal movement, reproduction rates, and grid cell size, have to be derived from telemetry studies, den mapping, and hunting studies respectively1, 2, 3. Different analytical methods are available for examining the spatial and temporal pattern of animal behaviour, including the influence of human factors such as hunting. Therefore, wildlife ecological studies often produce a varying outcome due to the differences in the underlying theory4. |
| Persistent UFZ Identifier | https://www.ufz.de/index.php?en=20939&ufzPublicationIdentifier=7677 |
| Staubach, C., Stiebling, U., Ziller, M., Tackmann, K., Thulke, H.-H., Schlüter, H. (2000): The consequences of using different analysis techniques on wildlife study data to model disease transmission In: Salman, M.D., Morley, P.S., Ruch-Gallie, R. (eds.) Proceedings of the 9th Symposium of the International Society for Veterinary Epidemiology and Economics (ISVEE 9), Breckenridge, CO, USA, 6-11 August 2000 International Society for Veterinary Epidemiology and Economics, p. 885 - 887 |
|