Publication Details

Category Text Publication
Reference Category Journals
DOI 10.1111/mec.70375
Licence creative commons licence
Title (Primary) Genetic estimates of relatedness: established practices and new opportunities through low coverage whole-genome sequencing
Author Freudiger, A.; Kestel, N.; Jovanovic, V.M.; de Brito, M.M. ORCID logo ; Ruiz-Lambides, A.V.; Nowick, K.; Widdig, A.; Ringbauer, H.
Source Titel Molecular Ecology
Year 2026
Department SUSOZ
Volume 35
Issue 11
Page From e70375
Language englisch
Topic T5 Future Landscapes
Data and Software links https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20139046
Supplements Supplement 1
Supplement 2
Supplement 3
Supplement 4
Keywords ancient DNA methods; kinship inference; microsatellites; paternity assignment; sequencing depth; wildlife genomics
Abstract Identifying close relatives in wild animal populations is fundamental across many research fields. Genetic estimates of relatedness have expanded rapidly in recent decades, drawing on a range of genetic data types. Here, we review their use and outline opportunities for future studies by combining two complementary approaches. First, we conducted a systematic literature review, assessing 2861 articles in depth to identify how genetic relatedness has been estimated over time. Second, we compare widely used genetic data types for inferring relatedness, conducting computational experiments using data from a rhesus macaque (Macaca mulatta) population in Puerto Rico. We compared other methods against precise identity-by-descent segment-based estimates of relatedness. Our results show that most studies of relatedness (87.8%) continue to rely on short tandem repeat (STR) markers, despite their limited precision. Single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-marker-based relatedness estimates remain underused (8% of studies), even though they yield more reliable estimates when sampled in sufficient numbers. Finally, we find that the simple pairwise-mismatch rate (PMR) method for estimating relatedness in whole-genome sequencing (WGS) data (commonly used in human ancient DNA studies) performs robustly on low-coverage data, for example, DNA retrieved from faecal samples or from cost-effective low-coverage WGS (lcWGS). Together, our findings highlight that lcWGS, combined with PMR-based relatedness estimation, is a promising, cost-effective alternative when DNA quality is limited, genomic resources are scarce, or economic efficiency is essential.
Freudiger, A., Kestel, N., Jovanovic, V.M., de Brito, M.M., Ruiz-Lambides, A.V., Nowick, K., Widdig, A., Ringbauer, H. (2026):
Genetic estimates of relatedness: established practices and new opportunities through low coverage whole-genome sequencing
Mol. Ecol. 35 (11), e70375
10.1111/mec.70375