Publication Details

Category Text Publication
Reference Category Journals
DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2026.134959
Licence creative commons licence
Title (Primary) Robustness of critical soil moisture to curve-fitting methods and its variability with soil depth, soil texture, and climatic conditions: insights from lysimeter data in Germany
Author Lu, X.; Groh, J.; Graf, A.; Pütz, T.; Gerke, H.H.; Gründling, R.; Rupp, H.; Kiese, R.; Vogel, H.J.; Javaux, M.; Vereecken, H.; Hendricks Franssen, H.-J.
Source Titel Journal of Hydrology
Year 2026
Department BOSYS
Volume 668
Page From art. 134959
Language englisch
Topic T5 Future Landscapes
Supplements Supplement 1
Keywords Evapotranspiration; Critical soil moisture threshold; Weighable lysimeter; Root zone soil moisture; Changing climatic conditions; Curve fitting
Abstract Actual evapotranspiration (ETa) is a vital terrestrial ecosystem process that links water, energy, and carbon cycles. ETa can be limited by either energy or water availability. The transition between water- and energy-limited regimes is related to soil moisture and is often characterized as a threshold, denoted as critical soil moisture threshold (θcrit). However, the determination of θcrit is subject to uncertainties due to the different methods used to evaluate the relationship between ETa and soil moisture (SM), such as SM depths, definitions of ETa and curve fitting functions. Typically, surface SM is used to identify θcrit as it is easily accessible and assumed to represent root zone SM status. Weighable lysimeter technology provides a unique opportunity to assess the role of root zone SM on the transition between water and energy limited ETa. It is widely regarded as the gold standard for measuring in-situ ET, and at the same time allows for in-situ SM measurements at different depths. In this study, we estimated θcrit using in situ SM measurements at 10 cm depth and root zone SM by vertically integrating in situ SM (0–60 cm) observations. In addition, we applied three different definitions of relative evapotranspiration (evaporative fraction, the ratio of ETa to grass reference evapotranspiration and the ratio of actual ETa to calculated potential evapotranspiration) as well as two different fitting curves to investigate the sensitivities of θcrit. We found robust θcrit estimates across different definitions and fitting curve methods, but the estimates were significantly higher for root zone than for surface θcrit. Our results also highlight the high correlation (0.83) between root zone and surface θcrit. However, the relation between both values is not unique since it depends on the actual moisture profile and plant root system and, herewith, on the soil type and previous weather conditions. We further observed that both surface and root zone θcrit decreased with increasing sand fraction. Under changing climatic conditions but with identical soil and ecosystem types, both surface and root zone θcrit decreased with increasing aridity. Additionally, we found that using the midpoint between field capacity and wilting point provides a reliable range of root zone θcrit for a given soil texture.
Lu, X., Groh, J., Graf, A., Pütz, T., Gerke, H.H., Gründling, R., Rupp, H., Kiese, R., Vogel, H.J., Javaux, M., Vereecken, H., Hendricks Franssen, H.-J. (2026):
Robustness of critical soil moisture to curve-fitting methods and its variability with soil depth, soil texture, and climatic conditions: insights from lysimeter data in Germany
J. Hydrol. 668 , art. 134959 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2026.134959