Publication Details

Category Text Publication
Reference Category Journals
DOI 10.3389/fevo.2021.786006
Licence creative commons licence
Title (Primary) Cheating promotes coexistence in a two-species one-substrate culture model
Author Xenophontos, C.; Harpole, W.S. ORCID logo ; Küsel, K.; Clark, A.T.
Source Titel Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
Year 2022
Department iDiv; PHYDIV
Volume 9
Page From art. 786006
Language englisch
Topic T5 Future Landscapes
Supplements https://ndownloader.figstatic.com/files/33320030
https://ndownloader.figstatic.com/files/33320036
Keywords coexistence; enzyme; cheating; cooperation; public goods; resource competition
Abstract Cheating in microbial communities is often regarded as a precursor to a “tragedy of the commons,” ultimately leading to over-exploitation by a few species and destabilization of the community. While current evidence suggests that cheaters are evolutionarily and ecologically abundant, they can also play important roles in communities, such as promoting cooperative behaviors of other species. We developed a closed culture model with two microbial species and a single, complex nutrient substrate (the metaphorical “common”). One of the organisms, an enzyme producer, degrades the substrate, releasing an essential and limiting resource that it can use both to grow and produce more enzymes, but at a cost. The second organism, a cheater, does not produce the enzyme but can access the diffused resource produced by the other species, allowing it to benefit from the public good without contributing to it. We investigated evolutionarily stable states of coexistence between the two organisms and described how enzyme production rates and resource diffusion influence organism abundances. Our model shows that, in the long-term evolutionary scale, monocultures of the producer species drive themselves extinct because selection always favors mutant invaders that invest less in enzyme production, ultimately driving down the release of resources. However, the presence of a cheater buffers this process by reducing the fitness advantage of lower enzyme production, thereby preventing runaway selection in the producer, and promoting coexistence. Resource diffusion rate controls cheater growth, preventing it from outcompeting the producer. These results show that competition from cheaters can force producers to maintain adequate enzyme production to sustain both itself and the cheater. This is similar to what is known in evolutionary game theory as a “snowdrift game” – a metaphor describing a snow shoveler and a cheater following in their clean tracks. We move further to show that cheating can stabilize communities and possibly be a precursor to cooperation, rather than extinction.
Persistent UFZ Identifier https://www.ufz.de/index.php?en=20939&ufzPublicationIdentifier=25682
Xenophontos, C., Harpole, W.S., Küsel, K., Clark, A.T. (2022):
Cheating promotes coexistence in a two-species one-substrate culture model
Front. Ecol. Evol. 9 , art. 786006