<< back

Publication Details

Reference Category Journals
DOI / URL link
Document accepted manuscript
Title (Primary) The future of complementarity: Disentangling causes from consequences
Author Barry, K.E.; Mommer, L.; van Ruijven, J.; Wirth, C.; Wright, A.J.; Bai, Y.; Connolly, J.; De Deyn, G.B.; de Kroon, H.; Isbell, F.; Milcu, A.; Roscher, C.; Scherer-Lorenzen, M.; Schmid, B.; Weigelt, A.;
Journal Trends in Ecology & Evolution
Year 2019
Department iDiv; PHYDIV;
Volume 34
Issue 2
Language englisch;
POF III (all) T11;
Keywords Complementarity; Ecosystem functioning; Resource partitioning; Abiotic facilitation; Biotic feedbacks; Biodiversity; Resource tracers; Plant-soil feedback; Stress amelioration; Complementarity effect
Abstract Evidence suggests that biodiversity supports ecosystem functioning. Yet, the mechanisms driving this relationship remain unclear. Complementarity is one common explanation for these positive biodiversity–ecosystem functioning relationships. Yet, complementarity is often indirectly quantified as overperformance in mixture relative to monoculture (e.g., ‘complementarity effect’). This overperformance is then attributed to the intuitive idea of complementarity or, more specifically, to species resource partitioning. Locally, however, several unassociated causes may drive this overperformance. Here, we differentiate complementarity into three types of species differences that may cause enhanced ecosystem functioning in more diverse ecosystems: (i) resource partitioning, (ii) abiotic facilitation, and (iii) biotic feedbacks. We argue that disentangling these three causes is crucial for predicting the response of ecosystems to future biodiversity loss.
ID 21197
Persistent UFZ Identifier https://www.ufz.de/index.php?en=20939&ufzPublicationIdentifier=21197
Barry, K.E., Mommer, L., van Ruijven, J., Wirth, C., Wright, A.J., Bai, Y., Connolly, J., De Deyn, G.B., de Kroon, H., Isbell, F., Milcu, A., Roscher, C., Scherer-Lorenzen, M., Schmid, B., Weigelt, A. (2019):
The future of complementarity: Disentangling causes from consequences
Trends Ecol. Evol. 34 (2), 167 - 180