Publication Details

Category Text Publication
Reference Category Journals
DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2008.01.023
Title (Primary) Performance of the Chemcatcher® passive sampler when used to monitor 10 polar and semi-polar pesticides in 16 Central European streams, and comparison with two other sampling methods
Author Schäfer, R.B.; Paschke, A.; Vrana, B.; Mueller, R.; Liess, M.
Source Titel Water Research
Year 2008
Department OEC; OEKOTOX
Volume 42
Issue 10-11
Page From 2707
Page To 2717
Language englisch
Keywords Pesticides; Monitoring; Pollution; Passive sampling; Chemcatcher®
Abstract We investigated the performance of the Chemcatcher®, an aquatic passive sampling device consisting of a sampler body and an Empore® disk as receiving phase, when used to monitor acetochlor, alachlor, carbofuran, chlorfenvinphos, -endosulfan, fenpropidin, linuron, oxadiazon, pirimicarb and tebuconazole in 16 Central European streams. The Chemcatcher®, equipped with an SDB-XC Empore® disk, detected seven of the aforementioned pesticides with a total of 54 detections. The time-weighted average (TWA) concentrations reached up to 1 µg/L for acetochlor and alachlor. Toxic units derived from these concentrations explained reasonably well the observed ecological effects of pesticide stress, measured with the SPEAR index. In a follow-up analysis, we compared the Chemcatcher® performance with those of two other sampling systems. The results obtained with the Chemcatcher® closely matched those of the event-driven water sampler. By contrast, the TWA concentrations were not significantly correlated with concentrations on suspended particles. We conclude that the Chemcatcher® is suitable for the monitoring of polar organic toxicants and presents an alternative to conventional spot sampling in the monitoring of episodically occurring pollutants.
Persistent UFZ Identifier https://www.ufz.de/index.php?en=20939&ufzPublicationIdentifier=1399
Schäfer, R.B., Paschke, A., Vrana, B., Mueller, R., Liess, M. (2008):
Performance of the Chemcatcher® passive sampler when used to monitor 10 polar and semi-polar pesticides in 16 Central European streams, and comparison with two other sampling methods
Water Res. 42 (10-11), 2707 - 2717 10.1016/j.watres.2008.01.023