Publication Details |
| Category | Text Publication |
| Reference Category | Journals |
| DOI | 10.1007/s00442-012-2538-y |
| Title (Primary) | Walter’s two-layer hypothesis revisited: back to the roots! |
| Author | Ward, D.; Wiegand, K.; Getzin, S. |
| Source Titel | Oecologia |
| Year | 2013 |
| Department | OESA |
| Volume | 172 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Page From | 617 |
| Page To | 630 |
| Language | englisch |
| Supplements | https://static-content.springer.com/esm/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00442-012-2538-y/MediaObjects/442_2012_2538_MOESM1_ESM.pdf |
| Keywords | Savanna; Tree–grass coexistence; Codominance; Equilibrium theory; Patch dynamics; Spatial heterogeneity; Resource partitioning; Root distributions; Water |
| UFZ wide themes | RU5; |
| Abstract | Walter (Jahrb Wiss Bot 87:750–860, 1939) proposed a two-layer hypothesis, an equilibrium explanation for coexistence of savanna trees and grasses. This hypothesis relies on vertical niche partitioning and assumed that grasses are more water-use efficient than trees and use subsurface water while trees also have access to deeper water sources. Thus, in open savannas, grasses were predicted to predominate because of their water use efficiency and access to subsurface water. This hypothesis has been a prominent part of the savanna literature since first proposed. We review the literature on Walter’s hypothesis and reconsider his original intentions. Walter intended this hypothesis to be restricted to dry savannas. In his opinion, mesic and humid savannas were controlled by biotic factors and disturbances. We surveyed the global savanna literature for records of vertical niche partitioning by grasses and trees. We find that, within the scope of Walter’s original intentions, this hypothesis works remarkably well, and in some cases is appropriate for deserts as well as for dry temperate systems and even some mesic savannas. |
| Persistent UFZ Identifier | https://www.ufz.de/index.php?en=20939&ufzPublicationIdentifier=13729 |
| Ward, D., Wiegand, K., Getzin, S. (2013): Walter’s two-layer hypothesis revisited: back to the roots! Oecologia 172 (3), 617 - 630 10.1007/s00442-012-2538-y |
|