Details zur Publikation |
| Kategorie | Textpublikation | ||
| Referenztyp | Buchkapitel | ||
| DOI | 10.5071/32ndEUBCE2024-2BV.9.4 | ||
| Titel (primär) | Navigating the combined potential of BECCS and forest-based solutions from the German bioenergy system perspective to achieve net-zero emissions | ||
| Titel (sekundär) | 32nd European Biomass Conference and Exhibition, 24-27 June, Marseille, France | ||
| Autor | Sadr, M.; Esmaeili Aliabadi, D.
; Wollnik, R.; Thrän, D. |
||
| Quelle | European Biomass Conference and Exhibition (EUBCE) Proceedings | ||
| Erscheinungsjahr | 2024 | ||
| Department | BIOENERGIE | ||
| Seite von | 352 | ||
| Seite bis | 356 | ||
| Sprache | englisch | ||
| Topic | T5 Future Landscapes | ||
| Keywords | bioenergy; BECCS; forest management; techno-economic modeling; negative emission technologies | ||
| Abstract | Germany has set an ambitious target of achieving net-zero emissions by
2045 to contribute to the Paris Agreement goals of limiting global
temperature rise. BECCS is considered a keystone technology for
providing negative emissions and enhancing energy system .exibility in
the presence of a high share of renewables; however, its large-scale
implementation faces multi-dimensional challenges related to technical,
.nancial, environmental, infrastructure, land use competition,
policy/regulatory, and public acceptance issues. On the other hand,
forest-based NETs like a.orestation and forest management o.er natural
carbon sinks and ecosystem services bene.t. But their potential is
limited and they face obstacles like land competition, .re risks,
regulatory hurdles, climate vulnerability, and time lags. This research
integrates BECCS and forest-based solutions into an optimization model
(BENOPTex) to assess their deployment for achieving climate targets
cost-e.ectively across Germany’s power, heat, transport, and chemical
sectors. Key aspects analyzed include feasibility, cost-e.ectiveness,
GHG removal potential and removal options, but did not consider
side-e.ects and possible trade-o.s (i.e. with biodiversity loss).
Preliminary .ndings show that combined BECCS and forest-based options
cannot meet Germany’s targets; hence, additional NETs are needed. BECCS
could provide around 60 Mt CO2 removal by 2050, while forest-based
options estimated to eliminate 39 Mt CO2. Combining BECCS with forest
management can also signi.cantly lower the system’s removal cost from
€177/t CO2 with solely BECCS to €100/t CO2. |
||
| dauerhafte UFZ-Verlinkung | https://www.ufz.de/index.php?en=20939&ufzPublicationIdentifier=29792 | ||
| Sadr, M., Esmaeili Aliabadi, D., Wollnik, R., Thrän, D. (2024): Navigating the combined potential of BECCS and forest-based solutions from the German bioenergy system perspective to achieve net-zero emissions 32nd European Biomass Conference and Exhibition, 24-27 June, Marseille, France EUBCE Proceedings ETA-Florence Renewable Energies, Florence, p. 352 - 356 10.5071/32ndEUBCE2024-2BV.9.4 |
|||