Details zur Publikation
Kategorie Textpublikation
Referenztyp Zeitschriften
DOI 10.1002/pan3.10678
Lizenz creative commons licence
Titel (primär) Reintroduced, but not accepted: Stakeholder perceptions of beavers in Germany
Autor Hohm, M.; Moesch, S.S.; Bahm, J.; Haase, D.; Jeschke, J.M.; Balkenhol, N.
Quelle People and Nature
Erscheinungsjahr 2024
Department CLE
Band/Volume 6
Heft 4
Seite von 1681
Seite bis 1695
Sprache englisch
Topic T5 Future Landscapes
Supplements https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/action/downloadSupplement?doi=10.1002%2Fpan3.10678&file=pan310678-sup-0001-Appendix.zip
Keywords Castor fiber; human–animal interactions; human-wildlife conflicts; keystone species; rewilding; species reintroductions
Abstract
  1. While reintroductions of regionally extinct native species usually benefit ecosystems, reintroduced animals often struggle to locate appropriate habitats where they can establish themselves without conflict with humans. European beavers (Castor fiber) were successfully reintroduced to Germany almost 60 years ago and have reached high abundances again. As beavers can damage trees and change landscapes, they are increasingly in conflict with humans.
  2. We investigated human perceptions of beavers in Germany using an online survey, as they are an example of a reintroduced species with an expanding population and potential conflicts with humans. We asked participants about their emotions (anger, fear, interest, joy) towards beavers and what they consider to be acceptable beaver habitats.
  3. Of nearly 1500 survey participants, 803 (53%) were from the general public, 475 (32%) from the agricultural sector and 219 (15%) from forestry. People in these sectors had very different perspectives: beavers were positively perceived by the general public, but negatively by stakeholders working in agriculture and forestry. Independently of stakeholder groups, we also found regional differences, as participants from Bavaria—the German state with the highest beaver densities—viewed beavers more negatively than those from the rest of Germany.
  4. Zoos and wildlife parks, as well as urban and nature conservation areas, were considered to be the most acceptable habitats for beavers, whereas survey participants did not accept private gardens and cultivated areas as beaver habitats.
  5. We discuss the sources of negative emotions towards beavers and how ecologically suitable habitats differ from those that appear acceptable by humans. Even 60 years after their reintroduction, beavers in Germany are still being recognized as both a novelty and a nuisance. Our findings highlight the need for active beaver management and increased public engagement to enable positive coexistence between beavers and humans in Germany.
dauerhafte UFZ-Verlinkung https://www.ufz.de/index.php?en=20939&ufzPublicationIdentifier=29359
Hohm, M., Moesch, S.S., Bahm, J., Haase, D., Jeschke, J.M., Balkenhol, N. (2024):
Reintroduced, but not accepted: Stakeholder perceptions of beavers in Germany
People Nat. 6 (4), 1681 - 1695 10.1002/pan3.10678