Details zur Publikation |
Kategorie | Textpublikation |
Referenztyp | Zeitschriften |
DOI | 10.1029/2021EF002476 |
Lizenz ![]() |
|
Titel (primär) | The Goldilocks zone in cooling demand: What can we do better? |
Autor | Maia-Silva, D.; Kumar, R.
![]() |
Quelle | Earth's Future |
Erscheinungsjahr | 2022 |
Department | CHS |
Band/Volume | 10 |
Heft | 1 |
Seite von | e2021EF002476 |
Sprache | englisch |
Topic | T5 Future Landscapes |
Supplements | https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/action/downloadSupplement?doi=10.1029%2F2021EF002476&file=2021EF002476-sup-0001-Supporting+Information+SI-S01.pdf |
Abstract | The higher frequency and intensity of sustained heat events have increased the demand for cooling energy across the globe. Current estimates of summer-time energy demand are primarily based on Cooling Degree Days (CDD), representing the number of degrees a day’s average temperature exceeds a predetermined comfort zone temperature. Through a comprehensive analysis of the historical energy demand data across the USA, we show that the commonly used CDD estimates fall significantly short (±25%) of capturing regional thermal comfort levels. Moreover, given the increasingly compelling evidence that air temperature alone is not sufficient for characterizing human thermal comfort, we extend the widely-used CDD calculation to heat index, which accounts for both air temperature and humidity. Our results indicate significant mis-estimation of regional thermal comfort when humidity is ignored. Our findings have significant implications for the security, sustainability, and resilience of the grid under climate change. |
dauerhafte UFZ-Verlinkung | https://www.ufz.de/index.php?en=20939&ufzPublicationIdentifier=25539 |
Maia-Silva, D., Kumar, R., Nateghi, R. (2022): The Goldilocks zone in cooling demand: What can we do better? Earth Future 10 (1), e2021EF002476 10.1029/2021EF002476 |