<< zurück

Details zur Publikation

Referenztyp Zeitschriften
DOI / URL Link
Volltext Shareable Link
Titel (primär) Dominant native and non‐native graminoids differ in key leaf traits irrespective of nutrient availability
Autor Broadbent, A.A.D.; Firn, J.; McGree, J.M.; Borer, E.T.; Buckley, Y.M.; Harpole, W.S.; Komatsu, K.J.; MacDougall, A.S.; Orwin, K.H.; Ostle, N.J.; Seabloom, E.W.; Bakker, J.D.; Biederman, L.; Caldeira, M.C.; Eisenhauer, N.; Hagenah, N.; Hautier, Y.; Moore, J.L.; Nogueira, C.; Peri, P.L.; Risch, A.C.; Roscher, C.; Schütz, M.; Stevens, C.J.;
Journal / Serie Global Ecology and Biogeography
Erscheinungsjahr 2020
Department iDiv; PHYDIV;
Band/Volume 29
Heft 7
Sprache englisch;
POF III (gesamt) T11;
Datenlinks https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.tmpg4f4v8
Supplements https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/action/downloadSupplement?doi=10.1111%2Fgeb.13092&file=geb13092-sup-0001-Supinfo.docx
Keywords biological invasions; functional traits; introduced species; invasive species; leaf traits; native species; nitrogen deposition; NutNet; nutrient availability; plant traits
Abstract

Aim

Nutrient enrichment is associated with plant invasions and biodiversity loss. Functional trait advantages may predict the ascendancy of invasive plants following nutrient enrichment but this is rarely tested. Here, we investigate (a) whether dominant native and non‐native plants differ in important morphological and physiological leaf traits, (b) how their traits respond to nutrient addition, and (c) whether responses are consistent across functional groups.

Location

Australia, Europe, North America and South Africa.

Time period

2007–2014.

Major taxa studied

Graminoids and forbs.

Methods

We focused on two types of leaf traits connected to resource acquisition: morphological features relating to light‐foraging surfaces and investment in tissue (specific leaf area, SLA) and physiological features relating to internal leaf chemistry as the basis for producing and utilizing photosynthate. We measured these traits on 503 leaves from 151 dominant species across 27 grasslands on four continents. We used an identical nutrient addition treatment of nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) at all sites. Sites represented a broad range of grasslands that varied widely in climatic and edaphic conditions.

Results

We found evidence that non‐native graminoids invest in leaves with higher nutrient concentrations than native graminoids, particularly at sites where native and non‐native species both dominate. We found little evidence that native and non‐native forbs differed in the measured leaf traits. These results were consistent in natural soil fertility levels and nutrient‐enriched conditions, with dominant species responding similarly to nutrient addition regardless of whether they were native or non‐native.

Main conclusions

Our work identifies the inherent physiological trait advantages that can be used to predict non‐native graminoid establishment, potentially because of higher efficiency at taking up crucial nutrients into their leaves. Most importantly, these inherent advantages are already present at natural soil fertility levels and are maintained following nutrient enrichment.

ID 23247
dauerhafte UFZ-Verlinkung https://www.ufz.de/index.php?en=20939&ufzPublicationIdentifier=23247
Broadbent, A.A.D., Firn, J., McGree, J.M., Borer, E.T., Buckley, Y.M., Harpole, W.S., Komatsu, K.J., MacDougall, A.S., Orwin, K.H., Ostle, N.J., Seabloom, E.W., Bakker, J.D., Biederman, L., Caldeira, M.C., Eisenhauer, N., Hagenah, N., Hautier, Y., Moore, J.L., Nogueira, C., Peri, P.L., Risch, A.C., Roscher, C., Schütz, M., Stevens, C.J. (2020):
Dominant native and non‐native graminoids differ in key leaf traits irrespective of nutrient availability
Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 29 (7), 1126 - 1138