Details zur Publikation |
Kategorie | Textpublikation |
Referenztyp | Buchkapitel |
DOI | 10.1007/978-3-319-96229-0_34 |
Titel (primär) | How good are bad species? |
Titel (sekundär) | Atlas of ecosystem services : drivers, risks, and societal responses |
Autor | Knapp, S.; Winter, M.; Zehnsdorf, A.; Kühn, I. |
Herausgeber | Schröter, M.; Bonn, A.; Klotz, S.; Seppelt, R.; Baessler, C. |
Erscheinungsjahr | 2019 |
Department | BZF; UBZ |
Seite von | 215 |
Seite bis | 223 |
Sprache | englisch |
Keywords | Biological invasions; Disservices; Economic benefits; Non-native species; Trade |
UFZ Bestand | Leipzig, Bibliothek, Hauptlesesaal, 00528047, 19-0075 DK: 575.858 Atl |
Abstract | Many non-native species have been introduced because they provide one or more ecosystem service. As some of these species also cause disservices, case-by-case approaches are required to assess risks vs. opportunities related to their spread. |
dauerhafte UFZ-Verlinkung | https://www.ufz.de/index.php?en=20939&ufzPublicationIdentifier=21442 |
Knapp, S., Winter, M., Zehnsdorf, A., Kühn, I. (2019): How good are bad species? In: Schröter, M., Bonn, A., Klotz, S., Seppelt, R., Baessler, C. (eds.) Atlas of ecosystem services : drivers, risks, and societal responses Springer International Publishing, Cham, p. 215 - 223 10.1007/978-3-319-96229-0_34 |