Details zur Publikation |
| Kategorie | Textpublikation |
| Referenztyp | Zeitschriften |
| DOI | 10.1111/cobi.12691 |
| Titel (primär) | Promoting nuclear energy to sustain biodiversity conservation in the face of climate change: response to Brook and Bradshaw 2015. Comment |
| Autor | Henle, K.; Gawel, E.; Ring, I.; Strunz, S. |
| Quelle | Conservation Biology |
| Erscheinungsjahr | 2016 |
| Department | OEKON; NSF |
| Band/Volume | 30 |
| Heft | 3 |
| Seite von | 663 |
| Seite bis | 665 |
| Sprache | englisch |
| UFZ Querschnittsthemen | RU6 |
| Abstract | We agree with Brook and Bradshaw (2015) that pragmatic decisions on future energy mixes should be made without prejudice. They assessed different techniques for electricity generation based on a selected number of criteria. Using a multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA), they concluded that nuclear energy ranked particularly well relative to costs for biodiversity in terms of land consumption and human safety risks. |
| dauerhafte UFZ-Verlinkung | https://www.ufz.de/index.php?en=20939&ufzPublicationIdentifier=15945 |
| Henle, K., Gawel, E., Ring, I., Strunz, S. (2016): Promoting nuclear energy to sustain biodiversity conservation in the face of climate change: response to Brook and Bradshaw 2015. Comment Conserv. Biol. 30 (3), 663 - 665 10.1111/cobi.12691 |
|