Publication Details |
| Category | Text Publication |
| Reference Category | Journals |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.01.031 |
| Title (Primary) | Ecological Fiscal Transfers in Europe – Evidence-based design options for a transnational scheme |
| Author | Droste, N.; Ring, I.; Santos, R.; Kettunen, M. |
| Source Titel | Ecological Economics |
| Year | 2018 |
| Department | OEKON |
| Volume | 147 |
| Page From | 373 |
| Page To | 382 |
| Language | englisch |
| Supplements | https://ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S0921800917301209-mmc1.pdf |
| Keywords | Ecological Fiscal Transfers; European Union; Natura 2000 network; Biodiversity conservation funding; Policy advice; Spatial econometrics |
| UFZ wide themes | RU6; |
| Abstract | Ecological Fiscal Transfers (EFT) have recently gained attention as a promising instrument addressing public authorities to provide incentives for nature conservation. In parallel, both the EU and various European countries are exploring new mechanisms to mobilise funding to support biodiversity conservation. We develop a proposal for an EFT design within the supranational context of the EU and assess its potential effects with evidence-based estimates. We i) provide both a theoretical underpinning and a synthesis of the current EFT schemes and EU Nature Directives, ii) propose a model for EFT implementation within the existing EU funding mechanisms based on quantitative and qualitative conservation indicators, iii) analyse how resulting payments would be (spatially) distributed among European regions, and iv) discuss the model outcomes in terms of ecological effectiveness, distributive effects and cost-effectiveness. We thereby contribute to the debate about how to better integrate ecological public functions within multi-level and supra-national governance structures. |
| Persistent UFZ Identifier | https://www.ufz.de/index.php?en=20939&ufzPublicationIdentifier=19881 |
| Droste, N., Ring, I., Santos, R., Kettunen, M. (2018): Ecological Fiscal Transfers in Europe – Evidence-based design options for a transnational scheme Ecol. Econ. 147 , 373 - 382 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.01.031 |
|