Details zur Publikation |
| Kategorie | Textpublikation |
| Referenztyp | Zeitschriften |
| Titel (primär) | Nutrient uptake kinetics of filamentous microorganisms: Comparison of cubic, exponential, and Monod models |
| Autor | Seki, K.; Thullner, M.; Baveye, P. |
| Quelle | Annals of Microbiology |
| Erscheinungsjahr | 2004 |
| Department | UMB |
| Band/Volume | 54 |
| Heft | 2 |
| Seite von | 181 |
| Seite bis | 188 |
| Sprache | englisch |
| Abstract | In practical situations where direct observation of the morphology and biomass distribution of filamentous microorganisms is not feasible, there is at present some uncer- tainty concerning the appropriate mathematical model to use to describe the substrate uptake and growth kinetics of these organisms. Some authors have argued that a "cubic" model was superior to available alternatives. In the present article, the experimental evi- dence upon which this claim was based is reanalyzed in detail. We identify a conceptual flaw in the rationale that led originally to that conclusion; we show that equally good fits to experimental data are obtained with the classical exponential model as with the cubic model. Finally, we demonstrate that a Monod-based nutrient uptake model outperforms both the cubic and the exponential models, and allows the full data set to be fitted, includ- ing a transition phase during which the rate of oxygen uptake decreases. Consequences of these observations, and the simplifications they afford, for the modeling of environ- mental or engineered systems are briefly addressed. |
| dauerhafte UFZ-Verlinkung | https://www.ufz.de/index.php?en=20939&ufzPublicationIdentifier=4547 |
| Seki, K., Thullner, M., Baveye, P. (2004): Nutrient uptake kinetics of filamentous microorganisms: Comparison of cubic, exponential, and Monod models Ann. Microbiol. 54 (2), 181 - 188 |
|