Details zur Publikation

Kategorie Textpublikation
Referenztyp Zeitschriften
DOI 10.1111/geb.13261
Lizenz creative commons licence
Titel (primär) Environmental heterogeneity predicts global species richness patterns better than area
Autor Udy, K.; Fritsch, M.; Meyer, K.M.; Grass, I.; Hanß, S.; Hartig, F.; Kneib, T.; Kreft, H.; Kukunda, C.B.; Pe'er, G.; Reininghaus, H.; Tietjen, B.; Tscharntke, T.; van Waveren, C.-S.; Wiegand, K.
Quelle Global Ecology and Biogeography
Erscheinungsjahr 2021
Department iDiv; ESS
Band/Volume 30
Heft 4
Seite von 842
Seite bis 851
Sprache englisch
Topic T5 Future Landscapes
Daten-/Softwarelinks https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.1rn8pk0qs
Supplements https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/action/downloadSupplement?doi=10.1111%2Fgeb.13261&file=geb13261-sup-0001-AppendixS1.docx
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/action/downloadSupplement?doi=10.1111%2Fgeb.13261&file=geb13261-sup-0002-AppendixS2.docx
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/action/downloadSupplement?doi=10.1111%2Fgeb.13261&file=geb13261-sup-0003-FigS3.1.pdf
Keywords area; biodiversity; biogeographical region; environmental heterogeneity; global species richness; species–area relationship
Abstract

Aim

It is widely accepted that biodiversity is influenced by both niche‐related and spatial processes from local to global scales. Their relative importance, however, is still disputed, and empirical tests are surprisingly scarce at the global scale. Here, we compare the importance of area (as a proxy for pure spatial processes) and environmental heterogeneity (as a proxy for niche‐related processes) for predicting native mammal species richness world‐wide and within biogeographical regions.

Location

Global.

Time period

We analyse a spatial snapshot of richness data collated by the International Union for Conservation of Nature.

Major taxa studied

All terrestrial mammal species, including possibly extinct species and species with uncertain presence.

Methods

We applied a spreading dye algorithm to analyse how native mammal species richness changes with area and environmental heterogeneity. As measures for environmental heterogeneity, we used elevation ranges and precipitation ranges, which are well‐known correlates of species richness.

Results

We found that environmental heterogeneity explained species richness relationships better than did area, suggesting that niche‐related processes are more prevalent than pure area effects at broad scales.

Main conclusions

Our results imply that niche‐related processes are essential to understand broad‐scale species–area relationships and that habitat diversity is more important than area alone for the protection of global biodiversity.

dauerhafte UFZ-Verlinkung https://www.ufz.de/index.php?en=20939&ufzPublicationIdentifier=24161
Udy, K., Fritsch, M., Meyer, K.M., Grass, I., Hanß, S., Hartig, F., Kneib, T., Kreft, H., Kukunda, C.B., Pe'er, G., Reininghaus, H., Tietjen, B., Tscharntke, T., van Waveren, C.-S., Wiegand, K. (2021):
Environmental heterogeneity predicts global species richness patterns better than area
Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 30 (4), 842 - 851 10.1111/geb.13261