Details zur Publikation

Kategorie Textpublikation
Referenztyp Zeitschriften
DOI 10.1002/wat2.1501
Lizenz creative commons licence
Titel (primär) Revisiting global trends in freshwater insect biodiversity: A reply
Autor van Klink, R.; Bowler, D.E.; Gongalsky, K.B.; Chase, J.M.
Quelle Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews-Water (WIREs Water)
Erscheinungsjahr 2021
Department iDiv; ESS
Band/Volume 8
Heft 2
Seite von e1501
Sprache englisch
Topic T5 Future Landscapes
Keywords arthropods; biomass; long‐term; monitoring; water quality
Abstract Jähnig et al. make some useful points regarding the conclusions that can be drawn from our meta‐analysis; however, some issues require clarification. First, we never suggested that there was a globally increasing trend of freshwater insect abundances, but only spoke of an average increasing trend in the available data. We also did not suggest that freshwater quality has improved globally, but rather that documented improvements in water quality can explain at least some of the trends we observed. Second, as we acknowledged, our data are not a representative set of freshwater ecosystems around the world, but they are what is currently accessible. Third, there is indeed no doubt that changes in abundance or biomass need not correlate with changes in other aspects of biodiversity, such as species richness or functional composition. Our analysis was specifically focused on trends in community abundance/biomass because it has been the subject of recent study and speculation, and is a widely available metric in long‐term studies. To better understand the recent changes in freshwater insect assemblages, we encourage freshwater ecologists to further open their troves of data from countless long‐term monitoring schemes so that larger and more comprehensive syntheses can be undertaken.
dauerhafte UFZ-Verlinkung https://www.ufz.de/index.php?en=20939&ufzPublicationIdentifier=24129
van Klink, R., Bowler, D.E., Gongalsky, K.B., Chase, J.M. (2021):
Revisiting global trends in freshwater insect biodiversity: A reply
Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.-Water 8 (2), e1501 10.1002/wat2.1501