Details zur Publikation

Kategorie Textpublikation
Referenztyp Zeitschriften
DOI 10.1007/s10531-006-9014-0
Volltext Shareable Link
Titel (primär) Differences in characteristics of reserve network selection using population data versus habitat surrogates
Autor Altmoos, M.; Henle, K.
Quelle Biodiversity and Conservation
Erscheinungsjahr 2007
Department NSF
Band/Volume 16
Heft 1
Seite von 113
Seite bis 135
Sprache englisch
Keywords reserve network; selection methods; data type; iterative algorithm; biodiversity conservation; species conservation; habitat models; species abundance
Abstract The use of species data versus environmental surrogates used in lieu of species data in systematic reserve site selection is still highly debated. We analyse in a case study whether and how the results of reserve network selection are affected by the use of species data versus habitat surrogates (habitat models) for qualitative (presence/absence) and quantitative (population size/habitat quality) information. In a model region, the post-mining landscape south of Leipzig/Germany, we used iterative algorithms to select a network for 29 animal target species from a basic set of 127 sites. The network results differ markedly for the two information types: depending on the representation goal, 18-45% of the selected sites chosen in response to one information type do not appear in the results for the other type. Given the availability of quantitative and hence deeper information, evaluation rules can be used to filter out the best habitats and the largest populations. In our model study, 0-40% less suitable areas were selected when instead of quantitative details only qualitative data were used. In view of various advantages and limitations of the two information types, we propose improving the methodological approach to the selection of networks for animal species by combining different information types.
dauerhafte UFZ-Verlinkung https://www.ufz.de/index.php?en=20939&ufzPublicationIdentifier=1608
Altmoos, M., Henle, K. (2007):
Differences in characteristics of reserve network selection using population data versus habitat surrogates
Biodivers. Conserv. 16 (1), 113 - 135 10.1007/s10531-006-9014-0