Press release from December 20, 2010

Globalisation burdens future generations with biological invasions

The consequences of the current high levels of socio-economic activity on the extent of biological invasions will probably not be completely realized until decades into the future

A new study on biological invasions based on extensive data of alien species from 10 taxonomic groups and 28 European countries has shown that patterns of established alien species richness are more related to historical levels of socio-economic drivers than to contemporary ones. An international group of 16 researchers reported the new finding this week in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS). The publication resulted from the three-year project DAISIE (Delivering Alien Invasive Inventory for Europe, www.europe-aliens.org), funded by European Union within its 6th Framework Programme.

The North American Raccoon

The North American Raccoon (Procyon lotor) is a medium-sized mammal native to North America.
Photo: André Künzelmann/UFZ

download as jpg (1.2 MB)

Common Ragweed

Common Ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia) is the most widespread plant of the genus Ambrosia in North America. Its wind-dispersed pollen is a strong allergen to many people with hay fever.
Photo: Klaus-Dieter Sonntag/ fotoplusdesign.de

download as jpg (1.8 MB)

Terms of use

Recent research has demonstrated that economic activities are among the most important determinants of biological invasions, fostering discussions about appropriate political strategies to prevent unintended introductions, e.g. in terms of trade regulations. Yet the frequent delay between first introduction of a species in a new territory and its establishment and spread suggest that invasions triggered by current economic behavior will possibly take a long time to become fully realized, causing what the researchers call an 'invasion debt'.

Taking an historical approach, this new study provides an explicit test of this phenomenon. The researchers selected three predictors of socio-economic activity linked to invasions - human population density, per capita GDP, and, as a measure of trade intensity (i.e. openness of an economy) the share of exports in GDP, and demonstrated that current alien species richness is better explained by socio-economic data from 1900 than from 2000. The strength of the historical signal varies among taxonomic groups with those possessing good capabilities for dispersal (birds, insects) more strongly associated with recent levels of socioeconomic drivers. Nevertheless, the results suggest a considerable historical legacy for the majority of the species groups analyzed.

"The broad taxonomic and geographic coverage indicates that such an ‘invasion debt’ is a widespread phenomenon", says Franz Essl from the Austrian Environment Agency. "This inertia is worrying as it implies that current, increased levels of socio-economic activity will probably lead to continuously rising levels of invasion during the upcoming decades, even if new introductions could be successfully reduced", explains Stefan Dullinger from the University of Vienna.

Therefore, the scientists write "...the seeds of future invasion problems have already been sown" and they expect the problem of invasive species to become worse in the next few decades. They say that efforts to control invasive species should be expanded with a special focus on not only those species currently most harmful, but also on early warning and rapid response for species already in the territory that are likely to pose the greatest future threat.

Publication

Franz Essl, Stefan Dullinger, Wolfgang Rabitsch, Philip E. Hulme, Karl Hülber, Vojtech Jarošík, Ingrid Kleinbauer, Fridolin Krausmann, Ingolf Kühn, Wolfgang Nentwig, Montserrat Vilà, Piero Genovesi, Francesca Gherardi, Anne-Marie-Laure Desprez-Loustau, Alain Roques, and Petr Pyšek (2010):
Socioeconomic legacy yields an invasion debt. - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS), published online early on December 20, 2010
www.pnas.org/content/early/recent
www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1011728108

More information

Dr. Ingolf Kühn, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ)
Tel. +49 345 / 558-5311
Dr. Ingolf Kühn

Doz. Dr. Stefan Dullinger, University of Vienna, Austria
Tel. +43 1 4277-54379
Dr. Stefan Dullinger

Dr. Franz Essl/ Dr. Wolfgang Rabitsch, Umweltbundesamt Österreich
Tel. +49 43 1 31304-3323

or

Tilo Arnhold
Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ)
Public Relations
presse@ufz.de
Tel. +49 341 235-1635

Im Helmholtz-Zentrum für Umweltforschung (UFZ) erforschen Wissenschaftler die Ursachen und Folgen der weit reichenden Veränderungen der Umwelt. Sie befassen sich mit Wasserressourcen, biologischer Vielfalt, den Folgen des Klimawandels und Anpassungsmöglichkeiten, Umwelt- und Biotechnologien, Bioenergie, dem Verhalten von Chemikalien in der Umwelt, ihrer Wirkung auf die Gesundheit, Modellierung und sozialwissenschaftlichen Fragestellungen. Ihr Leitmotiv: Unsere Forschung dient der nachhaltigen Nutzung natürlicher Ressourcen und hilft, diese Lebensgrundlagen unter dem Einfluss des globalen Wandels langfristig zu sichern. Das UFZ beschäftigt an den Standorten Leipzig, Halle und Magdeburg über 900 Mitarbeiter. Es wird vom Bund sowie von Sachsen und Sachsen-Anhalt finanziert.

Die Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft leistet Beiträge zur Lösung großer und drängender Fragen von Gesellschaft, Wissenschaft und Wirtschaft durch wissenschaftliche Spitzenleistungen in sechs Forschungsbereichen: Energie, Erde und Umwelt, Gesundheit, Schlüsseltechnologien, Struktur der Materie, Verkehr und Weltraum. Die Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft ist mit fast 28.000 Mitarbeiterinnen und Mitarbeitern in 16 Forschungszentren und einem Jahresbudget von rund 2,8 Milliarden Euro die größte Wissenschaftsorganisation Deutschlands. Ihre Arbeit steht in der Tradition des Naturforschers Hermann von Helmholtz (1821-1894).